The Virtual Hub for the Media of the The Benjamin School's Upper School

The Pharcyte

Breaking News
  • May 11Boys Varsity Lacrosse are the 2024 FHSAA 1A State Champions!!!
  • May 9Boys Track Won 3 Straight State Championships!!!
The Virtual Hub for the Media of the The Benjamin School's Upper School

The Pharcyte

The Virtual Hub for the Media of the The Benjamin School's Upper School

The Pharcyte


Who Will Win the Super Bowl?

  • Chiefs (67%, 2 Votes)
  • 49ers (33%, 1 Votes)
  • Taylor Swift (0%, 0 Votes)

Total Voters: 3

Loading ... Loading ...

First Amendment Under Fire As HB-1 Passes First Legislative Hurdle, Heads to State Senate

Social media is a hot topic among teens in the Sunshine State.
Social media is a hot topic among teens in the Sunshine State.

In a world where social media platforms have become the primary channels for communication and expression, the most recent passing of the HB-1 bill in the Florida House of Representatives sparks intense debate. While policymakers argue that it aims to protect children from harmful content on social media, the bill poses a significant threat to the First Amendment rights of children. 

The HB-1 bill was passed on January 24th in a 106-13 vote and imposes extremely, stringent regulations on social media platforms for those under the age of sixteen. The bill would require social media applications to prohibit minors from creating new accounts, terminate existing accounts, and use new methods to verify the ages of account holders. Even if a parent allows their child to download one of these applications, they will be unable to create an account as they will have to show some kind of identification. 

Pictured above are the 2023-2024 Florida House of Representatives on the opening day of the legislative session. (Photo Courtesy of USA today)

Other states such as Ohio, Arkansas, and Utah have tried to pass similar bills restricting social media but all have been stopped by lawsuits. The Ohio, Arkansas, and Utah bills all required parental consent for those under the age of sixteen to use social media. NetChoice, a tech company, has challenged the constitutionality of the law in Ohio and Utah and has sued the state of Arkansas for violating the First Amendment. The HB-1 bill will not even allow for social media use with parental consent making the proposition one of the strictest laws in the country.

While the intentions behind these measures may be to “protect” children from online harms, they come at a significant cost to children’s First Amendment rights. The First Amendment guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression to all. By imposing these restrictions on children’s ability to even access these platforms, the bill effectively limits their ability to speak for themselves and exercise these rights. 

The bill completely strips away children’s right to choose how they engage with people online.  Instead of allowing young people to make informed decisions about their online activities, the bill imposes restrictions that prevent them from exercising their autonomy. How can one claim to protect children’s rights when the bill strips away their fundamental freedoms? Are children below the age of sixteen not guaranteed First Amendment rights? 

The bill further sends a message that children are incapable of making responsible choices online and must be shielded from certain forms of communication and information, regardless of their individual circumstances or maturity. Not all children are the same, and not all need to be regulated by the government. The bill fails to recognize the diverse experiences of children and treats them as one similar group. 

The intention of those who have passed the bill is understandable. Social media platforms can be a dangerous place specifically for children. The idea of protecting children from cyberbullying or online harassment is admirable, but this bill is not the solution. 

Instead of resorting to regulations that restrict freedoms, lawmakers should focus on addressing these issues by educating children about online safety so that they receive the knowledge they need to make informed decisions and protect themselves from possible online threats. It is important to strike a balance between safety and freedom so that children can be protected from the evils of online while still having access to their constitutional rights. 

View Comments (2)
More to Discover
About the Contributor
Chase Zur
Chase Zur, Associate Editor
Chase Zur is a sophomore and this is her second semester in The Pharcyde. Chase has attended The Benjamin School since WOW and is excited to start her second year in the Upper School. She enjoys watching sports and spending time with friends and family. As a second year staff writer, Chase is looking forward to taking on more articles and improving her journalistic writing in The Pharcyde. 

Comments (2)

All The Pharcyte Picks Reader Picks Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • B

    BrianFeb 29, 2024 at 8:14 pm

    So as a parent I love this bill !!!! As far as a child’s first amendment rights I disagree that this violates them in anyway cause a child can not gain acess to internet with out it being provided by an adult a child can’t call Att and order internet or a phone Can not go to Walmart to buy one with out the money an adult gives him A child in fl has to be 16 to work and the bill follows already established law I see no amendment violation.

  • D

    Darrell ShorttFeb 29, 2024 at 12:23 pm

    Are children under 16 allowed to have a license or vote? No. The reason is because they are not old or experienced enough to make rational cognitive decisions. The same holds true for social media. Children are highly susceptible to outside influences and must be protected, not given free reign to do what they want.